Page Vault Resources

The Ephemeral Nature of Online Content: Why Timely Capture Matters

Last Updated March 2024

According to the American Sociological Association, online content has become instrumental in modern legal cases. One case study showed that 64% of judges used social media evidence to support “not guilty” verdicts in sexual harassment cases. Another study showed that out of 198 gang indictments involving social media evidence, 190 led to convictions. Not only is social media prominent in criminal cases, but also plays a critical role in civil cases. The fact that online content is such a major focus in modern legal cases should come as no surprise, as Pew Research estimates that about 70% of all Americans today use social media. Often, attorneys on both sides of a case race against one another to find, record, and file digital evidence. This is why timely capturing is so critical in the modern legal world.

Using Social Media at Trial - Jury Selection

Last Updated March 2024

Some estimates say that as many as 4.5 billion people (Statista) are using social media in 2023. This number includes includes attorneys, parties in the midst of litigation, and even jurors.

Given the large amount of information that people generally share over social media, there is a trove of information you can learn about individuals who may be involved in deciding your upcoming case. Such information can reveal biases and connections to parties that the prospective juror might not otherwise admit to.

However, before you start doing “deep dives” on every social media account you can find that is linked to a potential juror or paying for individuals to harvest any data they can find, it is worth slowing down and considering the ethical ramifications of using jurors’ social media information at trial.

The Wayback Machine: Questionable Source of Admissible Evidence

Last Updated April 2024

Though it may seem contradictory, information on the web is both fleeting and permanent, unchangeable yet frequently and easily altered. The internet is filled with countless dormant websites and web pages that have not welcomed any traffic or modifications for years. Active pages may change from day to day with text and images tweaked, added, removed, or revised due to changing marketing priorities and search engine optimization – or for more nefarious reasons. However, the historical yet no longer active online content lives on.

Authentication Methods

Last Updated March 2024

In today’s fast-paced digital world, where information is easily accessible with a few taps or clicks, it is important to confirm the reliability of the evidence. Unfortunately, digital evidence is especially susceptible to some types of manipulation, so it is important to ensure its validity using appropriate methods. In the practice of law, choosing the right authentication methods can impact the reliability and credibility of evidence presented in court, whether digital or tangible in nature.

Capturing Online Evidence Before It's Gone (Specht v. Google)

Last Updated March 2024

As legal teams address the myriad aspects of a case, it can be easy to overlook the importance of securely capturing and preserving digital content, such as websites, social media sites, and online videos. After all, the evidence is publicly available, and even if it gets removed, there are tools such as the Internet Archive (also known as the Wayback Machine) that can demonstrate what a site looked like in the past – right?

Admissible Digital Evidence Panel Discussion

Last Updated March 2024