What’s New at Page Vault: Celebrating Our 2025 Feature Drops
Last Updated November 2025
If 2025 had a theme for us, it’d be: “Make it faster, make it easier, and let legal teams do more.”
See more
.png)
Last Updated November 2025
If 2025 had a theme for us, it’d be: “Make it faster, make it easier, and let legal teams do more.”
See more.png)
Last Updated November 2025
Attorneys understand the duty to preserve evidence under common law and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. But in today’s digital environment, dynamic web content — websites, social media, ephemeral communications — presents an especially volatile category of electronically stored information (ESI). A Terms of Service page can change without notice. A tweet can disappear overnight. If these losses occur after the duty to preserve arises, courts are no longer hesitant to impose significant sanctions (see Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e)).
See more.png)
Last Updated September 2025
Online content disappears faster than most realize. A tweet is removed. A website is quietly edited. A post vanishes without notice. If that content becomes relevant to litigation, compliance, or an internal investigation, the opportunity to preserve it may already be lost. Historically, tools like Google’s cache or the Wayback Machine offered a second chance. But that safety net? It’s not holding up anymore.
See more.png)
Last Updated November 2025
As social media continues to shape how we communicate and consume information, social media influencers hold substantial sway over public opinion and consumer behavior. But with that influence comes a growing wave of legal scrutiny. More and more, influencers are finding themselves at the center of legal disputes, where their online content—and the personas they’ve crafted—play a key role in court. This article examines several high-profile cases involving influencers, exploring the legal challenges around authenticity, the admissibility of digital content, and what these developments mean for the future of influencer marketing.
See more%20(2).png)
Last Updated November 2025
Counterfeit goods and dupes represent an ever evolving and significant challenge for legal professionals tasked with intellectual property enforcement and brand protection. Counterfeits, which are unauthorized replicas often involving direct misuse of logos and trademarks, aim to deceive consumers while eroding brand trust and market value. Dupes, on the other hand, mimic the style, design, and functionality of premium products without directly copying protected elements, making them harder to litigate against and posing unique challenges in the IP landscape.
The consequences of counterfeit and dupe proliferation extend beyond economic losses for brands—they can also diminish consumer trust, lead to safety concerns, and weaken market integrity. As online marketplaces and social media platforms continue to evolve, so too must the strategies for monitoring and enforcing intellectual property rights.
See more.png)
Last Updated September 2025
Websites are constantly evolving, making it challenging for legal professionals to track changes over time. Whether monitoring potential trademark infringements, ensuring ongoing compliance with settlement agreements, or preserving critical evidence for litigation, having reliable, defensible records is essential. Without accurate documentation, key digital evidence can be lost or disputed. A consistent, automated approach to capturing website content helps safeguard legal integrity and strengthens case strategy.