Recognizing the critical need for expertise in this digital evidence collection, a panel discussion has been organized to shed light on best practices for securing and authenticating online evidence. This event promises to be a treasure trove of knowledge and insights, featuring three distinguished panelists who are leaders in web and digital evidence collection within the legal industry.
Websites, videos, and social media content can provide critical insights into a case, often acting as pivotal or even decisive elements. This digital evidence can unravel narratives, corroborate stories, and sometimes, serve as the "smoking gun" that sways legal outcomes.
However, the collection and handling of digital evidence are fraught with legal and technical challenges. Legal teams must navigate a complex landscape to ensure that such evidence is not only relevant but also admissible in court. A common pitfall involves the improper collection of online content, such as taking screenshots without considering the necessary metadata or failing to capture the digital footprint that authenticates the evidence. These oversights can lead to significant legal setbacks, as seen in recent cases where courts have excluded screenshots in trademark and copyright infringement cases due to questions around authenticity and integrity.
Panelists include:
Wendy Davis, Stokes Lawrence
Chris Bojar, Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg
Warren Singh, Latham & Watkins
This panel discussion aims to equip legal professionals with the knowledge and tools necessary to effectively collect and handle digital evidence, mitigating risks and enhancing the integrity of their cases. Attendees will have the opportunity to learn from real-life case studies, understand the legal requirements for digital evidence admissibility, and explore the latest technologies and methodologies in evidence collection. This event is an essential opportunity for anyone involved in litigation to stay ahead in the digital age, ensuring their practices align with current standards and court expectations for digital evidence handling.